Toxic by Design
beginning to unpack how wonky (& illogical) the rollout of the Covid 19 medical response has been
"This whole thing is a fraud."
"The only thing they [Covid-19 jabs] bare in common with traditional vaccines is the word [vaccine] ... toxic by design... criminal level of collusion and fraud."
I just posted this on Facebook.
We shall see how/whether it’s allowed any traction on that platform.
Can’t tell you how relieving it is to be able to say and explore whatever questions come to mind around this topic in particular … but anything really.
’Tis what free speech is meant to feel like imho.
The degree that we censor ourselves and when and why is perhaps a whole other Planet Andrea & Politics substack waiting to be written. But ohh myyyy it feels really good to not be having to choose my words carefully just to not be shut down/censored by “fact checking” infected social media platforms.
Anyway, back to my substack clarifying post that just happened on FB. I’ve been gathering steam for this, waiting for something to pop in that would be a place to begin.
Found it.
In this 20 minute clip from a recently recorded hours long unpacking of what’s really going on with this pandemic, I heard something that I’d stumbled into earlier…
Dr Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientist & Vice-President of Pulmonary Research at Pfizer, UK/USA speaking -
And not that it has any bearing on the overall efficacy or reasonableness for the way most of Western society has been devastatingly lead and impacted by what has not been an - actual - medical pandemic …
Still it’s alarming and outrageous and so anti-stable foundation … anti (actual) science and medically unethical - it blows my mind.
Of course, it would be reasonable to expect that there would be some variation of let’s call it “recipe” from one brand of a similar product to another … ie. it’s safe to assume that among the different Covid injections that have been referred to as ‘a vaccine’, produced under different corporate pharmaceutical brands … would vary - from each other.
This is how ‘patents’ work - again, another thing to unpack another day perhaps … bleh. Short version is, you can only patent (claim unique rights to) something that is not already patented and isn’t naturally occurring in the world.
But holy heck Batman … to not be able to assume that there is conformity and consistency across the different lots …. and possibly intentionally.
Yes, that’s right - there’s no way to trust that what’s in those vials is the same from one batch to the next. It’s a total crap shoot. Some lots are experiencing many adverse reactions reported and others not so much.
Dunno about you but -
I’m sorry, but that’s full stop “nope, never” for me.
Granting big Pharma immunity from liability to its own profit-seeking to the level of profiteering and potentially other more nefarious pursuits…. paired with the politics du jour.
Oof.
More here about liability - basically since the late 80’s it’s been fairly bullet - proof.
Clipped from this article:
Under 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22 – Standards of responsibility: Paragraph (b), which addresses “Unavoidable adverse side effects; warnings” states, “(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.“(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), a vaccine shall be presumed to be accompanied by proper directions and warnings if the vaccine manufacturer shows that it complied in all material respects with all requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act …” unless the plaintiff is able to show the manufacturer engaged in specific conduct or failed to exercise due care by clear and convincing evidence in its compliance with the Act.
Section (c) Direct warnings, states, “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.”
Again … I say “oof”